Overview of models - Revision history

Clemens Wingenbach: /* Overview of models by institution, decisions and sectors */

2016-03-17T12:01:04Z

‎Overview of models by institution, decisions and sectors

Samarth Kumar at 20:29, 23 January 2016

2016-01-23T20:29:16Z

Ingmar Schlecht at 13:08, 16 October 2015

2015-10-16T13:08:10Z

Ingmar Schlecht at 11:28, 1 August 2015

2015-08-01T11:28:08Z

Joern Richstein at 14:25, 16 July 2015

2015-07-16T14:25:53Z

Ingmar Schlecht at 08:29, 16 July 2015

2015-07-16T08:29:35Z

Joern Richstein at 17:20, 15 July 2015

2015-07-15T17:20:41Z

Joern Richstein at 17:17, 15 July 2015

2015-07-15T17:17:29Z

Joern Richstein: Replaced content with " Test "

2015-07-15T17:16:30Z

Replaced content with " Test "

Joern Richstein at 17:16, 15 July 2015

2015-07-15T17:16:15Z

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 <br/>
-=== Overview of models by institution, decisions and sectors ===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Model]] | ?author_institution | ?decisions | ?sectors | format=table }}
 === Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type ===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 To-do list general:
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 === Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type ===
-{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? sectors | ? model_class |? math_modeltype | ? decisions | ? timeresolution | ? georesolution | ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios| format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
+{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? sectors | ? model_class |? math_modeltype | ? timeresolution | ? georesolution | ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios| format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
 Todo
@@ Line 21: / Line 22: @@
 *Possibly add modularisation as an option?&nbsp;
 === Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing ===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? model_class | ? modelling_software |? processing_software | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
@@ Line 31: / Line 32: @@
 <br/>
 === Overview of models by open-source license, data availability etc. ===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? license | ? modelling_software |? model_source_public |? data_availability |? open_future | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 16 October 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:

	<br/>		<br/>
		+
		+	=== Overview of models by institution, decisions and sectors ===
		+
		+	{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] \| ?author_institution \| ?decisions \| ?sectors \| format=table }}

	=== Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type ===		=== Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type ===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 To-do list general:
@@ Line 9: / Line 8: @@
 <br/>
-'''Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type'''
+=== Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type ===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? sectors | ? model_class |? math_modeltype | ? decisions | ? timeresolution | ? georesolution | ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios| format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 *Possibly add modularisation as an option?&nbsp;
-<br/>'''Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing'''
+=== Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing ===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? model_class | ? modelling_software |? processing_software | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
@@ Line 28: / Line 27: @@
 <br/>
-'''Overview of models by open-source license, data availability etc.'''
+=== Overview of models by open-source license, data availability etc. ===
 {{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? license | ? modelling_software |? model_source_public |? data_availability |? open_future | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 To-do list general:
 *Standardization of answers (and maximum length for fields?)
 *Possible gap-filling and cleaning up of answer (preferably done by authors)
-*Adding/removing variables and possibly new tables ([http://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/wiki/Special:ViewXML?title=Special:ViewXML&categories%5BModel%5D=on here] the raw XML can be found which shows which data is available)<br/>
+*Adding/removing variables and possibly new tables ([[Special:ViewXML|here]] the raw XML can be found which shows which data is available)<br/>
 *Possibly add number of publications? On the one hand shows how established the model is, on the other hand doubtful if model pages are updated freuqently enough to be a reliable source&nbsp;
@@ Line 15: / Line 16: @@
 *Model class and sector are not very unified (e.g. compare "GAMS" and "Framework" both used as description of model class; electricity market, electricity sector, electricity all point to the same sector). Probably we should create new clearly defined categories with limited choices, or use existing ones more efficiently (Clear delineation between model class, Mathematical model type and implementing software)
 <br/>'''Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing'''

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 To-do list general:
-*Standardization of answers (and maximum length for fields?)<br/>*Possible gap-filling and cleaning up of answer (preferably done by authors)<br/>*Adding/removing variables and possibly new tables (&#x5B;&#x5B;RTECOLONFile:&#x5B;&#x5B;Special:ViewXML|http://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/wiki/Special:ViewXML?title=Special:ViewXML&categories&#x5D;&#x5D;[Model]=on|here]] the raw XML can be found which shows which data is available)&lt;br/&gt;<br/>*Possibly add number of publications? On the one hand shows how established the model is, on the other hand doubtful if model pages are updated freuqently enough to be a reliable source&nbsp;
+*Standardization of answers (and maximum length for fields?)
-&lt;br/&gt;
+<br/>
 '''Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type'''
-&#x7B;&#x7B;test#ask: &#x5B;&#x5B;Category:Model&#x5D;&#x5D; &#x5B;&#x5B;open_source_licensed :: true&#x5D;&#x5D; | ? sectors | ? model_class |? math_modeltype | ? decisions | ? timeresolution | ? georesolution | ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios| format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model &#x7D;&#x7D;
+{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? sectors | ? model_class |? math_modeltype | ? decisions | ? timeresolution | ? georesolution | ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios| format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
 Todo
@@ Line 14: / Line 16: @@
 *Model class and sector are not very unified (e.g. compare "GAMS" and "Framework" both used as description of model class; electricity market, electricity sector, electricity all point to the same sector). Probably we should create new clearly defined categories with limited choices, or use existing ones more efficiently (Clear delineation between model class, Mathematical model type and implementing software)
-&lt;br/&gt;'''Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing'''
+<br/>'''Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing'''
-&#x7B;&#x7B;test#ask: &#x5B;&#x5B;Category:Model&#x5D;&#x5D; &#x5B;&#x5B;open_source_licensed :: true&#x5D;&#x5D; | ? model_class | ? modelling_software |? processing_software | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model &#x7D;&#x7D;
+{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? model_class | ? modelling_software |? processing_software | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}
 Todo, missing fields
@@ Line 22: / Line 24: @@
 *Is the modelling software stack open-source (e.g. GNU MathProg, OpenJDK), or at least freely available (Java). Different fields for modelling and processing software?
-&lt;br/&gt;
+<br/>
 '''Overview of models by open-source license, data availability etc.'''
-&#x7B;&#x7B;test#ask: &#x5B;&#x5B;Category:Model&#x5D;&#x5D; &#x5B;&#x5B;open_source_licensed :: true&#x5D;&#x5D; | ? license | ? modelling_software |? model_source_public |? data_availability |? open_future | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model &#x7D;&#x7D;
+{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] | ? license | ? modelling_software |? model_source_public |? data_availability |? open_future | format = broadtable | mainlabel = Model }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 15 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	~~Test~~	+	To-do list general:
		+
		+	Standardization of answers (and maximum length for fields?)<br/>Possible gap-filling and cleaning up of answer (preferably done by authors)<br/>Adding/removing variables and possibly new tables ([[RTECOLONFile:[[Special:ViewXML\|http://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/wiki/Special:ViewXML?title=Special:ViewXML&categories]][Model]=on\|here]] the raw XML can be found which shows which data is available)<br/><br/>Possibly add number of publications? On the one hand shows how established the model is, on the other hand doubtful if model pages are updated freuqently enough to be a reliable source
		+
		+	<br/>
		+
		+	'''Overview of models by purpose, scope and modelling type'''
		+
		+	{{test#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] \| ? sectors \| ? model_class \|? math_modeltype \| ? decisions \| ? timeresolution \| ? georesolution \| ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios\| format = broadtable \| mainlabel = Model }}
		+
		+	Todo
		+
		+	*Model class and sector are not very unified (e.g. compare "GAMS" and "Framework" both used as description of model class; electricity market, electricity sector, electricity all point to the same sector). Probably we should create new clearly defined categories with limited choices, or use existing ones more efficiently (Clear delineation between model class, Mathematical model type and implementing software)
		+
		+	<br/>'''Overview of models by type, software, implementation and processing'''
		+
		+	{{test#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] \| ? model_class \| ? modelling_software \|? processing_software \| format = broadtable \| mainlabel = Model }}
		+
		+	Todo, missing fields
		+
		+	*Is the modelling software stack open-source (e.g. GNU MathProg, OpenJDK), or at least freely available (Java). Different fields for modelling and processing software?
		+
		+	<br/>
		+
		+	'''Overview of models by open-source license, data availability etc.'''
		+
		+	{{test#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] \| ? license \| ? modelling_software \|? model_source_public \|? data_availability \|? open_future \| format = broadtable \| mainlabel = Model }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 15 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{#ask: [[Category:Model]] [[open_source_licensed :: true]] \| ? sectors \| ? model_class \|? math_modeltype \| ? decisions \| ? timeresolution \| ? georesolution \| ? is_suited_for_many_scenarios\| format = broadtable \| mainlabel = Model }}	+
		+	Test