https://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ADatabase_schemaTalk:Database schema - Revision history2026-04-16T12:52:48ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.19.7https://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/index.php?title=Talk:Database_schema&diff=12218&oldid=prevLudwig Schneider: <nice-discussions-summary>2018-04-23T14:41:54Z<p><nice-discussions-summary></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr valign='top'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 14:41, 23 April 2018</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>==Additional oedp schema for ==</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>==Additional oedp schema for ==</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory".<br/>What do you think about this?<br/>Simon H.<span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory".<br/>What do you think about this?<br/>Simon H.<span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:Hello Simon,<br/>of course some data sets cannot be allocated without doubts and you list some good examples! The OEP has the ability to also put tags on a table: So PtH can be in demand or generation (depends on your perspective) and can be tagged with the additional schema (generation or demand).<br/>I don't really understand the proposal "trans_category". What would you write in the definition? <span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20180423144153">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]]  23 April 2018, 16:41 (CEST)</span></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div></div></td></tr>
</table>Ludwig Schneiderhttps://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/index.php?title=Talk:Database_schema&diff=10060&oldid=prev192.168.42.1: <nice-discussions-summary>2017-07-14T11:53:18Z<p><nice-discussions-summary></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr valign='top'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 11:53, 14 July 2017</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>==Additional oedp schema for ==</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>==Additional oedp schema for ==</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory". <br/>What do you think about this? <span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span></div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory".<br/>What do you think about this?<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline"><br/>Simon H.</ins><span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div></div></td></tr>
</table>192.168.42.1https://wiki.openmod-initiative.org/index.php?title=Talk:Database_schema&diff=10056&oldid=prev192.168.42.1: <nice-discussions-summary>2017-07-14T11:53:00Z<p><nice-discussions-summary></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><div class="NiceDiscussions START"><br />
<br />
==Additional oedp schema for ==<br />
We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory". <br/>What do you think about this? <span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span><br />
<span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div></div>192.168.42.1