|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | ==Additional oedp schema for == | | ==Additional oedp schema for == |
| − | We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory". <br/>What do you think about this? <span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span> | + | We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory".<br/>What do you think about this?<br/>Simon H.<span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span> |
| | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> | | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> |
Revision as of 11:53, 14 July 2017
Additional oedp schema for
We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.
Our proposal is something like "transCategory".
What do you think about this?
Simon H.
