Talk:Logo development 2016
From wiki.openmod-initiative.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | |
| ==C1 and C2== | | ==C1 and C2== |
− | Hi, <br/>thanks for taking the initiative, Robbie. <br/>Personally I prefer C1 and C2 over all others. The reason is that they appear much more compact and readible than all the others.<br/>I would suggest to mix colors though. Black writing and colorful box, maybe stick to the red. I think I would need to see some combination experiments here.<br/>Best Eva <span class="userid-40 comment-signature" timestamp="20161019060803">[[User:Eva Schmid|Eva Schmid]] 19 October 2016, 08:08 (CEST)</span> | + | Hi,<br/>thanks for taking the initiative, Robbie.<br/>Personally I prefer C1 and C2 over all others. The reason is that they appear much more compact and readible than all the others.<br/>I would suggest to mix colors though. Black writing and colorful box, maybe stick to the red. I think I would need to see some combination experiments here.<br/>A-logos: I find they look like a cloud picture of text (I forget how they are called, you know, when you count words and size the font according to their frequency)<br/>B-logos: My eye does not know where to focus as the left bound is hopping from o to i to o<br/>D: Too fat, too much color, it is jumping at me<br/>E: I could go for that as an alternative, however, I still prefer C as C is more "airy", E is square and full, C is open and leaves room for the eye<br/>F: My eye does not know where to focus<br/>G: My eye does not know where to focus and I feel like spinning sideways :) too much playing around for me<br/>H1-4: Again too complex for a logo for my liking, too many elements<br/>H5-6: Could potentially do with that however I find the logo not compact enough. It looks as it is falling apart due to gravity. Kind of words drooling.<br/>Hope that helps. My personal views. Looking forward to discussion. <br/>Best Eva<span class="userid-40 comment-signature" timestamp="20161019060803">[[User:Eva Schmid|Eva Schmid]] 19 October 2016, 08:08 (CEST)</span> |
| <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> | | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> |
Revision as of 06:18, 19 October 2016