Talk:Logo development 2016
From wiki.openmod-initiative.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | ==Style Guide== | | ==Style Guide== |
| | Thank you Robbie. I can see and appreciate the effort you put in this!<br/>Before going into a feedback loop I would suggest to discuss and clarify the objective and purpose and questions like:<br/>1. Do we want/need just an icon or a logo (with icon and text)?<br/>2. Where do we want to use it?<br/>3. Do we want to use picture language from the open source community?<br/>[http://fabfarm.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/open-source-concept_root.png http://fabfarm.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/open-source-concept_root.png] <span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20161019085754">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]] 19 October 2016, 10:57 (CEST)</span> | | Thank you Robbie. I can see and appreciate the effort you put in this!<br/>Before going into a feedback loop I would suggest to discuss and clarify the objective and purpose and questions like:<br/>1. Do we want/need just an icon or a logo (with icon and text)?<br/>2. Where do we want to use it?<br/>3. Do we want to use picture language from the open source community?<br/>[http://fabfarm.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/open-source-concept_root.png http://fabfarm.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/open-source-concept_root.png] <span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20161019085754">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]] 19 October 2016, 10:57 (CEST)</span> |
| | + | :I would second Ludwigs comment/suggestion to possibly use the open source community picture language. I based the logo for Open Power System Data Project as well on the open circle (even though quite abstracted: http://www.open-power-system-data.org/Logo_OPSD_bw_80.png). As does open_eGo: https://www.next-energy.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/open_ego_logo.png.<br/>But I don't think it's a must, just see it as a suggestion to spark your creativity ;) Completely changing a "brand's" visual appearance is always tricky, better to make incremental improvements. Aalthough I would argue that our brand's prominence isn't very high yet to take this argument very serious.<br/>Nevertheless I prefer C and would suggest to use a colourful default version wherever possible (for better visibility) that also works when printed as a greyscale version if necessary. I would also prefer a bold font that is not noo round (as in B).<br/>Thanks for your work! <span class="userid-134 comment-signature" timestamp="20161020084215">[[User:Martin Jahn|Martin Jahn]] 20 October 2016, 10:42 (CEST)</span> |
| | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> | | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> |
Revision as of 08:42, 20 October 2016
