|
|
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | ==Additional oedp schema for == | | ==Additional oedp schema for == |
| | We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory".<br/>What do you think about this?<br/>Simon H.<span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span> | | We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.<br/>Our proposal is something like "transCategory".<br/>What do you think about this?<br/>Simon H.<span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20170714115300">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 July 2017, 13:53 (CEST)</span> |
| | + | :Hello Simon,<br/>of course some data sets cannot be allocated without doubts and you list some good examples! The OEP has the ability to also put tags on a table: So PtH can be in demand or generation (depends on your perspective) and can be tagged with the additional schema (generation or demand).<br/>I don't really understand the proposal "trans_category". What would you write in the definition? <span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20180423144153">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]] 23 April 2018, 16:41 (CEST)</span> |
| | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> | | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> |
Latest revision as of 14:41, 23 April 2018
[edit] Additional oedp schema for
We (ZNES Flensburg) talked today with the oedp developers about the oedp schemas. The current structure with the existing categories are valuable and cover a lot. However, in modern energy systems it is often not easy to distinguish clearly between e.g. demand and production (Power2Heat, Pro-Sumer etc.). Therefore, we would like to propose a addtional versioned schema that is suitable.
Our proposal is something like "transCategory".
What do you think about this?
Simon H.
- Hello Simon,
of course some data sets cannot be allocated without doubts and you list some good examples! The OEP has the ability to also put tags on a table: So PtH can be in demand or generation (depends on your perspective) and can be tagged with the additional schema (generation or demand).
I don't really understand the proposal "trans_category". What would you write in the definition?
