Talk:Logo development 2016
From wiki.openmod-initiative.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| Thank you all for commenting.<br/>Regarding purpose, always a good question to ask:<br/>* uses (as I see it) are on websites (including Wikipedia) and possibly powerpoint presentations<br/>* I didn't work up logos with icons because the original was simple text, but will do so using open source imagery as a basis<br/>Must say I like the open_eGo logo. Will do some more work over the next two weeks and we can continue the discussion. <span class="userid-350 comment-signature" timestamp="20161024132446">[[User:Robbie Morrison|Robbie Morrison]] 24 October 2016, 15:24 (CEST)</span> | | Thank you all for commenting.<br/>Regarding purpose, always a good question to ask:<br/>* uses (as I see it) are on websites (including Wikipedia) and possibly powerpoint presentations<br/>* I didn't work up logos with icons because the original was simple text, but will do so using open source imagery as a basis<br/>Must say I like the open_eGo logo. Will do some more work over the next two weeks and we can continue the discussion. <span class="userid-350 comment-signature" timestamp="20161024132446">[[User:Robbie Morrison|Robbie Morrison]] 24 October 2016, 15:24 (CEST)</span> |
| ==Loop two== | | ==Loop two== |
− | I really like the design of the second loop! Again big Thank You Robbie.<br/><br/>Perhalps it could be easier to discuss and agree on basic components of the logo: <u>existing</u> / '''new'''<br/><br/>- Starting with the writings I would follow your opinion to use '''OpEnMod '''with capitals insted of <u>openmod</u> as the abbreviation<br/>- Change the name from <u>open energy modelling initiative</u> to '''Open Energy Modelling Initiative'''<br/>- In the existing logo, the Initiative is also <u>highlighted red</u>. I can see the intention behind it but prefer the '''same style''' (K1)<br/>- What fonts (and sizes) are you using? Should be '''the same font''' (K1, compare to K2 and N2)<br/>- The size of the name should be big and thus does not fit in one line (K1). The layout in M1 fits good and allows easy reading<br/>- The symbol (flash) in M1 is nice and can be placed in front. Perhaps combined with the O<br/>I tried to combine my suggestions and it looks like this<br/>[[File:[[File:OpEnMod logo U3.png|thumb|Add caption here]]]][[File:OpEnMod logo U3.png|thumb|openmod logo U3]] <span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20161111201256">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]] 11 November 2016, 21:12 (CET)</span> | + | I really like the design of the second loop! Again big Thank You Robbie.<br/><br/>Perhalps it could be easier to discuss and agree on basic components of the logo: <u>existing</u> / '''new'''<br/><br/>- Starting with the writings I would follow your opinion to use '''OpEnMod '''with capitals insted of <u>openmod</u> as the abbreviation<br/>- Change the name from <u>open energy modelling initiative</u> to '''Open Energy Modelling Initiative'''<br/>- In the existing logo, the Initiative is also <u>highlighted red</u>. I can see the intention behind it but prefer the '''same style''' (K1)<br/>- What fonts (and sizes) are you using? Should be '''the same font''' (K1, compare to K2 and N2)<br/>- The size of the name should be big and thus does not fit in one line (K1). The layout in M1 fits good and allows easy reading<br/>- The symbol (flash) in M1 is nice and can be placed in front. Perhaps combined with the O<br/>I tried to combine my suggestions and it looks like this<br/>[[File:[[File:OpEnMod logo U3.png|thumb|180px|Add caption here]]]][[File:OpEnMod logo U3.png|thumb|openmod logo U3]]<span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20161111201256">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]] 11 November 2016, 21:12 (CET)</span> |
| <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> | | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> |
Revision as of 20:13, 11 November 2016