Talk:Logo development 2016
From wiki.openmod-initiative.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | :Thanks for the effort.<br/><br/>I prefer using small letters way more. I like the easy way of having all words starting small.. Aren't capital letters very german (what you say Robbie)?.<br/><br/>I like the idea of including the open source symbol.<br/><br/>Though I like the way J1 is done (apart from the colour) I would prefer to have the chance to also use the logo without the text.<br/>Is there an interpretation for the flash?<span class="userid-71 comment-signature" timestamp="20161111205152">[[User:Berit Müller|Berit Müller]] 11 November 2016, 21:51 (CET)</span> | | :Thanks for the effort.<br/><br/>I prefer using small letters way more. I like the easy way of having all words starting small.. Aren't capital letters very german (what you say Robbie)?.<br/><br/>I like the idea of including the open source symbol.<br/><br/>Though I like the way J1 is done (apart from the colour) I would prefer to have the chance to also use the logo without the text.<br/>Is there an interpretation for the flash?<span class="userid-71 comment-signature" timestamp="20161111205152">[[User:Berit Müller|Berit Müller]] 11 November 2016, 21:51 (CET)</span> |
| | ::I prefer J1 as well. All other logos I find a bit hectic (the arrows and so forth). I like the idea of the keyhole to "open the black box of modelling". I agree with small letters. <span class="userid-40 comment-signature" timestamp="20161114075023">[[User:Eva Schmid|Eva Schmid]] 14 November 2016, 08:50 (CET)</span> | | ::I prefer J1 as well. All other logos I find a bit hectic (the arrows and so forth). I like the idea of the keyhole to "open the black box of modelling". I agree with small letters. <span class="userid-40 comment-signature" timestamp="20161114075023">[[User:Eva Schmid|Eva Schmid]] 14 November 2016, 08:50 (CET)</span> |
| | + | ::Some fun ideas coming from this - nice work!<br/><br/>Agreed with Berit on the case, all lower case does seem a lot smoother. The arrows would lead to a simple stand-alone logo, but I'm not sure they really communicate openmod (or OpEnMod ;) ) properly.<br/>For J1: "Opening the black box of modelling", as Eva puts it, is a nice touch, although it wasn't instantly obvious to me that it was a keyhole. Could try something with the first O of openmod being an incomplete circle/part of a keyhole? <span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20161114113734">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 14 November 2016, 12:37 (CET)</span> |
| | + | :::Thanks Robbie for the new designs!<br/><br/><br/><br/>I also like the idea of re-using or "citing" other open source logos. I personally like the last best, where the O or keyhole is used with the flashs. I also like the idea of O1-O3, where the "O" in Openmod is used as part of the logo.<br/><br/>What if we used the keyhole-O within the writing? I tried a rough sketch, but how can I upload it?<br/><br/><br/><br/>Cheers,<br/><br/>Katrin<br/><br/><br/><span class="userid-0 comment-signature" timestamp="20161115091043">[[Special:Contributions/192.168.42.1|192.168.42.1]] 15 November 2016, 10:10 (CET)</span> |
| | + | ::::Look for the "toolbox" icon in the left menu, there is the "Upload Wizard". <br/>Follow instructions to upload.<br/>Then use the "image" icon in the text editor to search for your picture and post it.<span class="userid-227 comment-signature" timestamp="20161115234656">[[User:Ludwig Schneider|Ludwig Schneider]] 16 November 2016, 00:46 (CET)</span> |
| | + | :::On the lines of O of openmod and keyhole coming together (accidentally didn't log in before posting yesterday...) I've attached a very basic mock-up of it. My actual design skills are pretty minimal, but hopefully it get the idea across!<br/>Is this similar to your thoughts Katrin?<br/>[[File:Openmod logo idea - bryn pickering.png]] <span class="userid-334 comment-signature" timestamp="20161116182142">[[User:Bryn Pickering|Bryn Pickering]] 16 November 2016, 19:21 (CET)</span> |
| | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> | | <span class="NiceDiscussions END"></span></div> |
Latest revision as of 18:21, 16 November 2016
