User:Robbie Morrison/sandbox
From wiki.openmod-initiative.org
< User:Robbie Morrison(Difference between revisions)
|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | sandbox
| + | |
| + | Some suggestions: |
| + | |
| + | *the various '''Property:*''' pages should explain the meaning of the field. Particularly obscure (for me anyway) is '''Property:Is suited for many scenarios'''. Does that mean that new scenarios can be defined by difference to a reference scenario? |
| + | *the '''Property:Math modeltype''' should also accept the following values: ''accounting'', ''hybrid'', and ''game theory''. And possibly ''energy-economy'' or ''economic equilibrium'' or ''general equilibrium'' (for top-down models, of which there are none so far), ''input/output'', ''econometric'', and ''integrated assessment'' (for completeness, more than anything else, at this point). |
| + | *the '''Property:License''' need only record the abbreviated form of the license where it is well known, for example: GPLv2 and not GNU General Public License version 2.0. The '''Property:License''' page can then contain a list of expansions. |
| + | *the '''Property:Model source public''' could be renamed '''Property:Distribution''' and contain the values: ''git repository'', ''svn repository'' (not that I know of any projects using subversion), ''download'' (anonymous download that is), ''on application'' (meaning requires registration), and ''by invitation'' (meaning that applicants will be screened and approved). |
| + | *a new '''Property:First''' release date to record the year or full date of first public release (this would provide interesting historical information) |
| + | *a new '''Property:Status''' which accepts: ''planned'', ''active'', ''unmaintained'', and ''discontinued'' (this would allow users to see which projects are alive or not). |
| + | |
| + | In addition: |
| + | |
| + | *maybe the license information should be split into '''Property:Code license''' and '''Property:Data license''' to distinguish between the codebase (say GPLv3) and datasets (say CC BY 4.0). |
Revision as of 09:30, 8 December 2016
Some suggestions:
- the various Property:* pages should explain the meaning of the field. Particularly obscure (for me anyway) is Property:Is suited for many scenarios. Does that mean that new scenarios can be defined by difference to a reference scenario?
- the Property:Math modeltype should also accept the following values: accounting, hybrid, and game theory. And possibly energy-economy or economic equilibrium or general equilibrium (for top-down models, of which there are none so far), input/output, econometric, and integrated assessment (for completeness, more than anything else, at this point).
- the Property:License need only record the abbreviated form of the license where it is well known, for example: GPLv2 and not GNU General Public License version 2.0. The Property:License page can then contain a list of expansions.
- the Property:Model source public could be renamed Property:Distribution and contain the values: git repository, svn repository (not that I know of any projects using subversion), download (anonymous download that is), on application (meaning requires registration), and by invitation (meaning that applicants will be screened and approved).
- a new Property:First release date to record the year or full date of first public release (this would provide interesting historical information)
- a new Property:Status which accepts: planned, active, unmaintained, and discontinued (this would allow users to see which projects are alive or not).
In addition:
- maybe the license information should be split into Property:Code license and Property:Data license to distinguish between the codebase (say GPLv3) and datasets (say CC BY 4.0).