|
|
(3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) |
Line 43: |
Line 43: |
| |is_suited_for_many_scenarios=No | | |is_suited_for_many_scenarios=No |
| |montecarlo=No | | |montecarlo=No |
− | |citation_references=Weinhold and Mieth (2020), Fast Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow through Low-Impact and Redundancy Screening. | + | |citation_references=Weinhold, Richard, and Robert Mieth. 2021. “Power Market Tool (POMATO) for the Analysis of Zonal Electricity Markets.” SoftwareX 16 (December): 100870. |
− | |citation_doi=0.1109/TPWRS.2020.2994764 | + | |citation_doi=10.1016/j.softx.2021.100870 |
− | |report_references=Schönheit, Weinhold, Dierstein (2020), The impact of different strategies for generation shift keys (GSKs) on the flow-based market coupling domain: A model-based analysis of Central Western Europe. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114067 | + | |report_references=Schönheit, Weinhold, Dierstein (2020), The impact of different strategies for generation shift keys (GSKs) on the flow-based market coupling domain: A model-based analysis of Central Western Europe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114067. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Weinhold, Richard, and Robert Mieth. 2020. “Fast Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Through Low-Impact and Redundancy Screening.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (6): 4574–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2994764. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Weinhold, Richard. 2021. “Evaluating Policy Implications on the Restrictiveness of Flow-Based Market Coupling with High Shares of Intermittent Generation: A Case Study for Central Western Europe.” ArXiv preprint 2109.04940v1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04940. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Weinhold, Richard, and Robert Mieth. 2021. “Uncertainty-Aware Capacity Allocation in Flow-Based Market Coupling.” ArXiv preprint 2109.04968v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04968. |
| |Model input file format=No | | |Model input file format=No |
| |Model file format=No | | |Model file format=No |
| |Model output file format=No | | |Model output file format=No |
| }} | | }} |
Latest revision as of 12:41, 12 January 2022
Power Market Tool
by TU Berlin
Authors: Richard Weinhold, Robert Mieth
Contact: Richard Weinhold
|
POMATO stands for (POwer MArket TOol) and is an easy to use tool for the comprehensive analysis of the modern electricity market. It comprises the necessary power engineering framework to account for power flow physics, thermal transport constraints and security policies of the underlying transmission infrastructure, depending on the requirements defined by the user. POMATO was specifically designed to realistically model Flow-Based Market-Coupling (FBMC) and is therefore equipped with a fast security constrained optimal power flow algorithm and allows zonal market clearing with endogenously generated flow-based parameters, and redispatch.
Based on Julia/JuMP. Using Python for data processing.
Website / Documentation
Download
|
Open Source GNU Library or "Lesser" General Public License version 3.0 (LGPL-3.0)
Directly downloadable
Some input data shipped
|
Model Scope |
Model type and solution approach |
Model class
|
Network-constrained Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch
|
Sectors
|
Electricity Market, Heat
|
Technologies
|
Renewables, Conventional Generation, CHP
|
Decisions
|
dispatch
|
Regions
|
User-dependent
|
Geographic Resolution
|
Nodal resolution
|
Time resolution
|
Hour
|
Network coverage
|
transmission, DC load flow, net transfer capacities
|
|
Model type
|
Optimization
|
|
Linear Economic Dispatch. Linear Optimal Power Flow. Linear Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow
|
Variables
|
|
Computation time
|
minutes
|
Objective
|
Cost minimization
|
Uncertainty modeling
|
Chance Constrained
|
Suited for many scenarios / monte-carlo
|
No
|
|
References
Scientific references
Weinhold, Richard, and Robert Mieth. 2021. “Power Market Tool (POMATO) for the Analysis of Zonal Electricity Markets.” SoftwareX 16 (December): 100870.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2021.100870
Reports produced using the model
Schönheit, Weinhold, Dierstein (2020), The impact of different strategies for generation shift keys (GSKs) on the flow-based market coupling domain: A model-based analysis of Central Western Europe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114067.
Weinhold, Richard, and Robert Mieth. 2020. “Fast Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Through Low-Impact and Redundancy Screening.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (6): 4574–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2994764.
Weinhold, Richard. 2021. “Evaluating Policy Implications on the Restrictiveness of Flow-Based Market Coupling with High Shares of Intermittent Generation: A Case Study for Central Western Europe.” ArXiv preprint 2109.04940v1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04940.
Weinhold, Richard, and Robert Mieth. 2021. “Uncertainty-Aware Capacity Allocation in Flow-Based Market Coupling.” ArXiv preprint 2109.04968v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04968.
◀ back to model list